Power Speaks to Truth

Ben Shapiro says President Trump’s tombstone should read: “45th President of the US. He said lots of stuff”. Indeed, Trump speaks frequently and often without the filter most politicians apply.

Trump’s lack of filter is a double-edged sword. We see more of the good and the bad than we do for almost any other politician. Honestly, most of us are irritated when most politicians carefully pick and choose their words, put their fingers into the wind, and stage events to portray an image not aligned with their true nature. Trump, more than most, shows us his true self. Therefore, he comes across as far more genuine than most politicians. His authenticity also means he can relate to the ordinary Americans. Still, Trump could desperately use that filter on occasion. He also comes across as abrasive, rude, and impolite. His off-the-cuff messages are imprecise and easily misconstrued. As a supporter, I recognize he says too much at times and brings criticism upon himself with ill-advised word choices and frequent stream-of-consciousness.

People are upset when I show the positive side of Trump’s personality or deflect some of the criticism of him. How can I possibly support a man who faults are so apparent? How can I support a man who is so dangerous? Their observations may (sometimes) be accurate, but their overall assessment is a major problem. They claim their conclusions are patently obvious for all, but the other side adds too much meaning to his words, meaning that just isn’t there. Their dishonesty regarding Trump is the real problem.

Trump Hates Immigrants?

Trump is portrayed as a man who hates immigrants, yet it is far closer to the truth to say he opposes the excesses of immigration, not immigrants themselves. An acquaintance of mine claims his rhetoric dehumanizes immigrants.

https://sampost.com/2024/6088/the-dehumanizing-of-immigrants

My father would say this is too cute by half. The animal reference is highlighted below. The last sentence is the portion of the larger text which is shared. Trump was making a point about the impact of immigration on crime, but the full context is generally ignored.

He labels as animals those few immigrants who repaid America’s openness and generosity to them with heinous and violent acts. Many of us can also be carried away by our anger and passion when recounting such things. Trump does dehumanize a select few individuals, but this is not a blanket hatred for immigrants. I am not “twisted” by this emotional appeal. I am not manipulated to hate all immigrants. I am not swept away by Trump’s brilliant oratory and ignoring the “parallels to Hitler”. What parallels, my friend? I need better examples before drawing parallels.

trump-2024-interview-immigration-etc.

Perhaps a vote for Trump is actually in support of immigration, not a general condemnation of immigrants as my acquaintance suggested? How is it Trump dehumanizes all immigrants while at the same time openly advocates for legal immigration?

Trump is Hitler?

The comparisons to Hitler are egregiously hyperbolic. I dislike Trump’s word choice also, but Leftists lose the argument when referring to Hitler.

Hitler said plainly the holocaust was the final solution to the Jewish Question. He advocated for the propagation of one race and the total annihilation of others.

Trump’s “animal” reference may be inappropriate, but it does not come anywhere close to Hitler’s despicable rhetoric and clearly unmistakable evil.

Trump has said a lot of inadvisable stuff. Still, he never called for the propagation of a single race. Has he never called for a holocaust of an entire group of people. He has not shown antipathy toward all immigrants, Jews, Gypsies, Blacks, or any other ethnic group. In fact, he even has Jewish grandchildren and a daughter who converted.

trump-vermin-hitler-immigration-authoritarian-republican-primary

I choose not to label people I dislike “animals” or “vermin”. We are all redeemable. In any case, who are labeled “vermin” by Trump? Leftist thugs, disreputable people, anti-democratic ideologues.

What a wonderful dialogue we have constructed: condemn the use of an inappropriate label (vermin) by using an even more inappropriate label (Hitler).

What exactly does Trump mean by “root out”? To defeat, perhaps? To stop ill intent? NPR does a mile-wide stretch and says it means “Hitler-like”. This type of nonsensical thinking consumes our politics today. I understand why so many tune out.

Sorry, the word “vermin” in a sentence does not equate to embracing Nazi ideology.

Of course, the upcoming election means more insanity. Democrat strategist James Carville compares Trump’s planned speech at Madison Square Garden on October 27 to a Nazi rally there in February 1939.

James Carville: Trump Is Telling You He’s a Fascist, “We’re Not Making This Up” | Video | RealClearPolitics

What is the connection between the two events, on different dates, in two completely different eras, for two entirely different purposes? We could just as easily say Donald Trump is invoking Billy Graham. Graham spoke at Madison Square Garden as well.

Carville does not hide his true intent with any sort of façade. He has to know it doesn’t make a lick of sense to discerning folks, yet I am sure this tactic is effective and influences a handful of voters (the ultimate goal). Hillary Clinton (a Carville associate) repeated the same stupid narrative. Keep doubling down on nonsense. Candidate Kamala Harris jumped on the pile next.

Yes, it would be deeply troubling if Donald Trump invoked Adolf Hitler, but has he really? I haven’t seen it yet.

Kamala Harris and the Democrats say they have yet again found the long sought Holy Grail, but it seems to be another suspect thin reed. what-john-kelly-said-about-Trump General John Kelly, President Trump’s former Chief of Staff, claimed Trump “liked Hitler’s generals” and that he said “Hitler did some good things”.

Which particular good things, General Kelly? Perhaps building the autobahn or starting the Volkswagen company could be considered good things? How about the tactics of Hitler’s general, Erwin Rommel? American General George Patton respected Rommel. Perhaps President Trump watched the movie in which Patton praises Rommel: “you magnificent bastard”? Rommel was also implicated in a plot to kill Hitler. He was executed for his role. Does this give Rommel credibility, someone we can talk about positively? General Kelly’s comments are non-specific, no mention of an inappropriate word and no praise for a specific Hitler action. It is a ton of smoke, but still no fire.

There are always multiple sides to every conflict. President Trump fired General Kelly unceremoniously. Maybe he has an axe to grind? Furthermore, Trump’s comments were supposedly uttered six or seven years ago. Why wait so long, days before an election, to inform us? Were these comments of no concern before today? Has the general been negligent in warning us? There is also no corroboration from others. In addition, others had issues with General Kelly. Jared Kushner, in his biography, said the general was “consistently duplicitous” and that he even shoved his wife during an encounter in the White House.

President Lincoln also had a good deal of backstabbing from subordinates. From his initial days, his cabinet sought to undermine his presidency. The commanding general he fired early in the war, ran against him in the 1864 presidential election. Things have been tough all over it seems.

Who knows what Trump actually said to Kelly? However, I do know one-channel media extravagantly embellishes the story and politicians repeat it ad nauseum to emphasize a point that is not so substantive and not proven. We don’t need to embellish anything Hitler said, and if Trump was a knock-off we wouldn’t need to embellish his language either. Please stop with the comparisons.

Please Stop!

Where is there a direct statement in which Trump broadly condemns all immigrants? Where is the statement that Trump endorses any evil of Adolf Hitler? There are none. There is only connecting of widely dispersed dots that form no actual pattern. One-channel media reports on smoke, but cannot find a fire.

Labeling individuals “vermin”, “animal”, “deplorable”, “Hitler”, “Nazi”, etc. must stop. I say this to all, including President Trump.

The comparisons to Hitler and Nazi are especially toxic. If Trump is a re-incarnation of Hitler, any action can be justified. In fact, such action is invited by the politicians and one-channel media who so carelessly sling their accusations.

If I thought Trump were anything comparable, I would NEVER vote for him. On the other hand, Democrats vile rhetoric regarding Hitler and Nazis is yet another reason this party should never hold power. They have set our nation up for a deeply divisive aftermath to the 2024 election no matter the results.

Every Republican president or presidential candidate in my lifetime has been subjected to similar comparisons. The last ten years, the rhetoric has been ratcheted to further extremes, not only to politicians like Trump, but to all his supporters. I am labeled a fascist or worse for simply sporting a bumper sticker. Our views will never be tolerated by the government if Democrats ever gain full control of the American system. They already openly advocate for shutting down dissenting speech. They already shut down religious worship during COVID. They will keep extending those boundaries, until we say no more.

Hitler was a one-of-a-kind evil. Nobody in American politics: not Donald Trump, not George Bush, not Joe Biden, not Kamala Harris, none of them, compares. Still, the Democrat Party ideology is extremely problematic (I say demonic), but we should not use a broad brush to paint all party supporters, many of whom believe in righteous causes. Stop these repulsive comparisons because you dislike a candidate’s tax policy or their intent to build a wall. Stop appealing to emotion and let us have a reasoned discussion.

Power Seeks to Replace Truth

During the Trump/Harris presidential debate, moderator David Muir, NBC debate moderator, fact checked President Trump by discounting the story of Haitian migrants eating cats and dogs, raised by Trump during the debate.

Subsequently, Wikipedia created a page to debunk Trump’s claim: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Springfield_pet-eating_hoax, complete with the Nazi connection:

My friends also told me the story was based on hearsay and that “Trump made it up”.

Mr. Muir’s “fact check” was based on a statement from the Springfield City Manager. Yet, the city manager was contradicted by numerous residents Springfield Ohio Pet Snatchers. Going back to March 2024 the issue was raised in a Springfield town hall meeting (and directed to the same city manager). Days before the debate, several other stories surfaced regarding Springfield. Trump was repeating what he had heard in the news. Perhaps residents’ stories were not true, but Trump had far more basis for this claim than VP Harris had for saying President Trump was: “invoking Adolf Hitler”.

In other words, this was already a story well before Trump elevated it. There was even a corroborating 911 call about geese this time being taken from the local pond.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/new-police-call-audio-from-springfield-ohio-appears-to-confirm-haitian-goose-story/ar-AA1qoMrs

Perhaps it wasn’t a good talking point.  Maybe someone else invented the story, but Trump certainly did not.  Again, one-channel media reports on smoke but can’t point to a fire. There were no Nazi groups spreading the rumor, only people in Springfield telling their story to media. Trump and Vance simply repeated the negative story which millions of us also heard, a fairly common act for politicians during a campaign.

Should we accept government statements without skepticism, especially when many others are challenging the official position? None of us live in Springfield, so who are we to say who is correct and who is not? Kamala Harris and Donald Trump could have debated the truth of this issue, but it is not appropriate for a moderator to insert himself into the debate when the full truth is elusive.

The phrase “Speak truth to power” used to mean something, but my friends and others are unwilling to challenge the powers that be. Government provides the ultimate truth for them. When I challenge the government position, they say I am doubting reality or engaging in conspiracy theories (or as Wikipedia claims: aligning with neo-Nazis). So, instead we have: “When power speaks, the search for the truth can rest”. Government resolves the debate because they are somehow the source of truth. Case closed. Yet, how often in the recent past have accounts from ordinary folks been juxtaposed with denials from government officials? The government lied repeatedly during COVID. https://seek-the-truth.com/category/covid/. I do not claim to know the whole truth in this instance, but I feel certain there is something to the claims.

In any case, the whole point of the discussion has been lost. Cats and dog are simply a distraction. Importing 20,000 immigrants (or even 20,000 American citizens from another state) into such a small town, is definitely problematic: schools, hospitals, law enforcement, utilities, etc. need to respond to the increase demand for services. Where are all these people to live? It takes time to construct new homes. These are points worth discussion, but instead the conversation devolves into name calling and phony allegations.

And there are immigration problems on a broader scale. We should debate what is the right level of immigration, how to treat immigrants to our country, what we should expect from them, etc.. Trump is defining a problem and proposing solutions. You may disagree with his solutions, but they are not rooted in hatred of immigrants. Even VP Harris recently acknowledged there are major immigration problems (during her interview with Brett Baer on October 16).

We have a serious problem with our caustic rhetoric. However, it seems our politicians don’t even believe their own rhetoric. If so, how could they possibly engage in niceties with Hitler? And if they don’t believe their own rhetoric, why should we?

Dave https://seek-the-truth.com/about/
https://seek-the-truth.com/category/elections/
seek-the-truth.com

Leave a comment